My definition of a nuclear reaction states that if transmutation is found then it must be nuclear.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:28 AM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > What if it works and the energy source isn't Nuclear? > > Or possibly that it in Nuclear but it is an entirely different to what we > know? > > IMO that it is anomalous and makes no sense makes it more likely to be > real. > > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The multi-H reaction could be producing vast amounts of nickel because >> of its magic number. But no one can really tell how much nickel >> participates in the reaction including Rossi. >> >> >> Regards. >> >> Axil >> >> >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:53 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 18:49:11 -0400: >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> >I believe that the Ni-H theory that Rossi advertizes is invalid and I >>> hold >>> >that fusion of multi H is occurring. >>> >>> There is no reason why this would result in Copper, but it would make >>> sense for >>> it to result in Nickel, but perhaps not to the exclusion of all else. >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> >>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>> >>> >> >
