Perhaps the best person to discuss your hydrino ideas is Randy Mills himself. This is science, not religion, so orthodoxia and heterodoxies can discuss freely and peacefully- based on experimental facts. I think it is both fair and interesting.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 13:27:20 +0300: > Hi, > [snip] > >not so close, perhaps. Is Randy speaking about something like this? Again > >practical data not limits of theory > [snip] > Randy doesn't think Hydrinos can penetrate the electron shells of other > atoms. I > think he may be wrong, particularly for very small ones. Note also that if > my > variation on his model is correct, then my smallest Hydrinos are much > smaller > than his (about the size of an atomic nucleus). > > Furthermore there are also other possibilities, i.e. > > 1) The Hydrino may acquire an additional electron becoming Hydrinohydride, > then > it might displace an inner electron of another atom, analogous to a > negative > muon, except that it is much heavier, and would try to take up a closer > orbit. > > 2) Hydrinos have a strong magnetic field, hence they may bind magnetically > to > bare nuclei of other atoms that have a magnetic moment. This would keep > them in > close proximity until such time as they tunneled into the other nucleus. > > 3) Hydrino molecules are also neutral entities, and these may also be able > to > pass through the electron shells of other atoms. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
