This statement from AR is consistent with the “nickel powder affixed to the reactor vessel wall” conjecture.
*Can you refuel a module after several months without completelyremoving it for service, that is, by pouring Nickel (kitty food) into thedevice. That is, you don’t have to ship it back to the factory by FederalExpress. (That would make it easier to use in Ships, forexample.)* ** *AR: 3- No, we have to change the modules, eventually refueling them athome (so far). Ships do not stay away from ports more than 6 mo. * On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Andrea Selva < [email protected]> wrote: > I'd love to see a picture at least of one of them. > Just to see if they looks like the drunk plumbing job as in the last demo. > :) > > > 2011/5/16 Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> > >> Joseph Fine >> May 16th, 2011 at 5:45 >> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473&cpage=10#comment-39284> >> >> Dr. Rossi, >> >> 1) How many E-Cats are operating now? >> >> AR: 1- We have completed all the 330 modules of the 1 MW plant. >> >> 2) If you have a number of E-Cats operating together in a power plant and >> want to turn some of them on or off, can you do that remotely ( almost >> certainly ) or do you have to do it manually (turning valves and throwing >> switches)? Can you control the E-Cats individually or only in groups or >> sections? >> >> AR: 2- Remotely- Singularly >> >> 3) Can you refuel a module after several months without completely >> removing it for service, that is, by pouring Nickel (kitty food) into the >> device. That is, you don’t have to ship it back to the factory by Federal >> Express. (That would make it easier to use in Ships, for example.) >> >> AR: 3- No, we have to change the modules, eventually refueling them at >> home (so far). Ships do not stay away from ports more than 6 mo. >> > >
