In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 26 May 2011 03:53:45 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Stremmenos Paper does not take about 4H + Ni60, The paper takes about a >single neutral hydrogen atom H + Ni58. Rossi says the same thing.
And both may be wrong. > > > >we adopt the hypothesis of trapping a neutral temporary atom, or a mini >atom, of hydrogen (with a diameter less than *10-14 m*) which transforms >the *Ni**58* nucleus into *Cu**59* (copper/59, short lived isotope*). This may be the wrong hypothesis. > > > >The same process(single neutral hydrogen) must be capable of producing all >those light elements. The devil is in the details. You are demanding that a particular result be obtained while adhering to restrictions that you impose. It's like asking someone to box with their hands tied behind their back. [snip] >> >I say that it is impossible (unthinkable it just cannot be) to create >> >light elements from the fission of nickel or copper. What you should have said that it is impossible if only a single Hydrogen is involved in the reaction. >> [snip] >> What's impossible about: >> >> 4H + Ni60 => 2 S32 + 16.7 MeV ? >> >> (Note that while fissioning Ni costs energy, that is more than compensated >> for >> by the excess mass of the free protons.) >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
