May 30th, 2011 at 6:12 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497&cpage=1#comment-42319>
Herald Patterson

Thank you for refuting those two metropolitan legends. Unfortunately, there are other legends and unfounded rumors circulating around the internet as well. I will list a few of them here in case you would like to comment on them, and put an end to some ridiculous speculation that is taking place on the internet.

[ Gee ... he didn't mention us by name !!! ]

1) Other than the catalysts, hydrogen pressure, the special processing of the nickel powder, and the heat added to the system by the resistors there is some "other" factor that is critical to making the system work. For example, a source of radio frequency radiation to stimulate the processes inside the reactor vessel.

AR: 1- Yes: like Flash Gordon! Seriuosly: what happens inside the reactor is influenced only by what is inside; outside there is only cooling and thermalization

2) No gamma radiation is actually produced inside of the reactor vessel. They claim you will not let independent scientists measure the gamma radiation inside the reactor *not* because the signatures detected could reveal the patent pending catalysts, but because no gamma radiation would be found.

AR: 2- Gamma have been regularly measured by us

3) No nickel is actually transmuted into copper. They try to connect this to the lack of gamma radiation, to support their idea that some extraordinary but totally *non-fusion* process is taking place.


AR:3- Analysys of powders are the evidence of the transmutation

4) That you no longer think any form of fusion is taking place. They claim because you use the term Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, you non longer think a fusion reaction is taking place between the nickel and hydrogen.


AR: 4- Wrong

5) Others claim there is no radiation being produced, except from beta-decay. Some push this idea to support a pet theory they religiously proclaim all over the net called, "Widom Larsen" theory.


AR:5-Beta decay has nothing to do with my process, Widom Larsen theory has nothing to do with my process

Reply via email to