Robin, I agree And perhaps these yet to be discovered devices to travel thru time will look like UFOs! Your "temporal cycle" would generate Alternate time branches making it difficult to capture future technology without altering the sequence of events in the future which would allow the capture - does give support to the need for secrecy and sequestering of any captured technology if the use had to limited to non interference with the time line! Fran
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 6:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:pesn.com: Cold Fusion #1 Claims NASA Chief In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:01:26 -0700: Hi, [snip] >At 12:47 PM 6/1/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: >>On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan J Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > If you can sneak a proton into Nickel by some non-classical-fusion means, >> > resulting in Copper, then it's not FUSION? >> >>Naaa, that's transmutation. Let's see how the NASA folks like that term! ;-) > >eCAT : Energy (from) Controlled Alchemical Transmutation !!!!! Fits in nicely with the notion that the World is stuck in a temporal cycle, with future being the past. The ancient gods were the people of the future, and ancient knowledge is scientific knowledge that we are still developing, so alchemy of the past is no more than poorly remembered CF of the future. Perhaps one day we will succeed in time travel. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
