Would a proton *orbiting* a negatively charged ion be more likely to undergo spontaneous fusion with ion's nucleus than two free protons wondering around at room temperature?
Harry > >From: Harry Veeder <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 9:29:04 PM >Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Third Way > > >This have very large orbits, but might heavy rydberg systems play role? >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_Rydberg_system > >(They were first observed in 2000) > >Harry > >> >>From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:07:55 PM >>Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Third Way >> >>I believe that the Randell L. Mills hydrino technology and the Rossi H-Ni >>technology are one in the same. >> >> >>From the mills patent application: >> >>http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20110114075 >> >>[quote]The power source of claim 2 wherein the reaction mixture comprising an >>oxidation-reduction reaction to cause the catalysis reaction comprises: (i) >>at >>least one catalyst chosen from Li, LiH, K, KH, NaH, Rb, RbH, Cs, and >>CsH[/quote] >> >>As a general statement, the catalyst for H-Ni technology is one or more of >>the >>following compounds Li, LiH, K, KH, NaH, Rb, RbH, Cs, and CsH. the catalyst >>is >>one among the alkali metals including lithium (Li), sodium (Na), potassium >>(K), rubidium (Rb), caesium (Cs). These elements will produce Rydberg matter >>in >>abundance when exposed to a hot hydrogen atmosphere. >> >> >>Because Rydberg matter is hard to detect and categorize, I believe that Mills >>is >>producing Rydberg matter and misinterpreting it as being fractionally charged >>hydrogen. >> >>It looks to me that Mills has every possible combination of catalysts and >>lattice material locked down and it will be an interesting legal battle for >>the >>courts to determine who controls the rights to the H-Ni technology. >> >>Mills has not yet recognized that Rydberg matter is at the bottom of his >>reactor >>just like it is for the reactors of Rossi and the rest. >> >>
