At 12:32 PM 6/18/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-06-18 18:27, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Some more info:

* * *

3) What do you consider is the maximum “safe” output level?

4) Do you think the one megawatt power plant being opened by Defkalion might operate with zero input?

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=13#comment-46963

Dear Herald OPatterson,
Here are the additional answers:
3- the maximum safe output level is 10 kW per module
4- Not so far, it is too dangerous. So far. We are making modiles operate without input in this precise moment, but under my direct control.

Yeah. Controlling with electrical heat input is way simpler. It's been said that the output of one E-Cat could heat another. Not at the operating temperatures involved. It's necessary to be able to heat the reaction chamber to operating temperature, which is 450 degrees C or so. To do that, the generating E-Cat must operate at a higher temperature!

Unless, of course, electricity is generated, which is inefficient, but they may not care, if the waste heat is still available in the output. Thermoelectric power, though, doesn't seem to be efficient enough, my guess, if the E-Cat is operating at 6:1 excess power over input power, thermoelectric wouldn't cut it. But a hybrid solution might work: i.e., recirculate working fluid to reach a generated "internal ambient" temperature, then boost it with thermoelectric-generated power to produce reaction chamber temperature that's higher.

It's fun to think about but all this can easily be a waste of time.

The simple solution is to use mains power. You get heating that is (say) six times the mains power usage, which is certainly worth doing if the costs are low enough. You get easy control by electronics, no moving parts needed. The mains power is not wasted, it all ends up as heat.

Thermoelectrics would add a lot of equipment cost with not that much advantage that I can see. It's looking like an E-Cat is not much more than some plumbing, it could be very cheap to make with off-the-shelf parts. The expensive (and difficult) thing is the preparation of the catalyst/fuel, but they are claiming low refueling cost, and if that's true and not just smoke, then they will be, I'd expect, making money hand over fist at E 5000 per E-Cat, is that the price now?

Reply via email to