These communications by Rossi are taking a bizarre turn.  All this paranoid
talk about reporters acting for competitors and telling everyone to just
wait for the big demonstration a few months away is making me very
suspicious of Rossi's claims of inventing a new energy producing device.  I
was involved in an effort by another so called energy inventor named Dennis
Lee who reacted in a similiar way to criticism of his energy device.
Attacking those who found faults, instead of addressing the faults that were
found.  Talking of conspiracies against him and his organization and telling
everyone to just wait for the big demonstration of his technology that will
prove him right.  The problem was that the big demonstration never happened,
and he was never proven right.  I fear we may witness the same from Rossi.
Don't be surprised if the big October rollout of Rossi's E-Cat is delayed,
then delayed again, as the excuses mount.  This pattern of behavior is
familiar with these sort of "inventors".  I hope my inclinations are wrong
about Rossi, but I have to go with what I have experienced before.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]
> wrote:

> ...Or at least, this is what Rossi is implying in the comment below pasted
> from his blog. It looks like we will know more details about it after the
> presentation of the 1-MW plant in October. Rossi paints a grim picture where
> LENR researchers backstab each other in order to obtain research funds and
> exclusivity rights. Very sad if true. Let's hope it's just confabulation
> following his anger outburst.
>
> * * *
>
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-**physics.com/?p=497&cpage=8#**comment-47160<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497&cpage=8#comment-47160>
>
> June 19th, 2011 at 9:17 AM
>
> Dear Staffan:
> Your comment opens the space to an intriguing consideration. Many
> Scientists have taken the correct approach: wait for the 1 MW plant in
> operation, then make due considerations. This is what smart People did.
> About pseudo-Scientists and their reaction to my Effect: probably you have
> read of the “Snake” report after an interview he made in Bologna. Now, as
> probably most of you have understood, we have very good , (VERY GOOD),
> intelligence working with us; after the “snake” (disguised as a journalist)
> who has this week penetrated our organization and made a report based on a
> fake steam diagram, we asked to our intellicence organization to probe what
> was behind, and we discovered that:
> 1- The fake diagram of steam has been given to the “snake” from an Italian
> competitor that is afraid to lose the funds due to the fact that the
> taxpayers are tired to give him money while we have reached results without
> any funding
> 2- this Italian clown has been given the fake diagram fro an American
> Laboratory, competing with us, which gave it to him for the same reason
> 3- the snake has been sent to us to try to dwarf us to allow them to get
> funding
> All this is very funny. The names and the particulars of this paper tigers
> will be explained from me as an anecdote after the start up of the 1 MW
> plant in Greece: after the start up, after the explication of the theory,
> this will be the dessert. Something to laugh with.
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>
> * * *
>
> Cheers,
> S.A.
>
>

Reply via email to