At 03:41 PM 6/21/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jeff Driscoll wrote:

I've been trying to say multiple times that the meter measures
humidity of air up to 98% humidity.  The probe can go to 150 C without
being broken but that does not mean that it can measure accurately up
to 150 C.
But that's for *air* anyway.  We want to know the steam quality.  This
probe does *not* do this.

It takes an expensive complicated system to measure steam quality and
even then, the one I found on the market needs an overpressure of some
amount so that it can expand it into a chamber and then measure the
resulting temperature,

Not according to the Delta Ohm company or the Testo company. They say their meters tell you the enthalpy per kilogram of steam, so all you have to do is determine the mass.

Jed, stop it! They don't mention steam. That meter measures "air quality." Not "steam quality."

Let me repeat, they don't say what you just claimed they said. They said something else that you translated into what you said, making assumptions. That gets you into trouble!

Perhaps you know more than the engineers at these companies, and perhaps you are right and they are wrong. I doubt that. I'll go with those companies and with Dr. Galantini. I will also go with the results of the second test with water, which confirmed the steam test.

Well, Dr. Galantini hasn't said squat about this. Where is his report? And the "engineers at these companies" didn't say what you reported.

Jed, if those steam quality "measurements" are a part of your basis for confidence that Rossi is real, please let me know, so I can revise my own opinion!

Okay, Krivit got a mail from Galantini: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/20/galantini-sends-e-mail-about-rossi-steam-measurements-today/

Galantini wrote:

Good morning, on the request made to me today, as I have repeatedly confirmed to me that many people have requested in the past, I repeat that all the measurements I did, during tens of tests done to measure the amount of not evaporated water (read liquid water, TN) present in the steam produced by “E-Cat” generators, always was made providing results in “% of mass”, since the used device indicates the grams of water by cubic meter of steam. I confirm that the measured temperature always was higher than 100,1°C and that the measured pression in the chimney always was equal to the ambient pressure.

The instrument used during the tests performed in the presence of Swedish teachers was as follows: 176 Text Code 0572 H2 1766 .


"The used device indicates the grams of water by cubic meter of steam."

The device is the Testo (that's a translation artifact, the "Text Code." This is http://www.testosites.de/export/sites/default/datalogger2011/en_INT/local_downloads/brochure_EN.pdf Testo 176 H2 in this brochure.

The device does log (it's a data logger) g/m^3. But I'm pretty sure that this is a calculated measurement, it's grams of water *vapor* per cubic meter of *air.* Not "steam" as he says. I can't find any hint that this device is intended to measure steam quality. I was unable to find an operating manual.

There is no sensor in the device that would detect other than water vapor. It's an RH meter!

It's looking now like Galantini did err.

Maybe some hero will appear with magic confirmation of how to measure steam quality with an RH meter!


Reply via email to