This comment is tangled in another long thread. I would like to repeat it, to draw attention to it.
Joshua Cude wrote: Until replication of Miles' heat/helium claims makes it past replication, > there is nothing to critique. > Miles' heat/helium claims were published in peer reviewed journals in 1993 and 1994. If Cude knew that, he was being dishonest. If he did not know that, he has never bothered to read the literature on cold fusion. - Jed
