Rossi said: Andrea Rossi July 12th, 2011 at 6:24 AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501&cpage=1#comment-52306>
Dear Malcom, Yes, also. Warm Regards, A.R. "Yes also" means that both the reaction vessel and the lead shield both generated heat, IMHO. the proportions are as follows: reaction vessel = a lot Lead shied = a little. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > Malcolm > July 12th, 2011 at 5:02 > AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501&cpage=1#comment-52288> > > Thank you for your detailed reply to Dr. Mario Voltaggio. You mention that > the heating effect is due to gamma absorption by the lead. I assume from > this that the lead shielding is in fact in direct contact with the copper > water jacket and so the water is heated from the outside. Is this correct? > > AR ===> YES > > > Luke Mortensen > July 11th, 2011 at 8:17 > PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501&cpage=1#comment-52193> > > Three new topics of research have been mentioned in the last few weeks: > A) Developing 30KW ecat modules. > AR ====> A- Working on this. > > B) Increasing efficiency of steam electricity production > AR ====> B- in progress: within one year we should be ready > > C) Perfecting designs for self sustaining ecats with no input electricity > AR ====> C- Remarkable progress > > >
