I think these old boy were given to believe they were among critically objective scientists giving a warm welcome with nothing to hide. I think they all had a little to much trust in each other's obvectivity and the whole think snowballed into what we have today. I don't disclude myself from the little-to-much trust failing, by the way.
A lot of small mistakes along the way make an interesting story. It's all present in the series of reports with each small error adding to the varacity. On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote: > The thing that's most amazing about all of this is that 2 doddering Swedish > academics were sucked in by it. > >
