>From Jed: > No, he adjusts the power.
Same thing then. The key point being Rossi was constantly monitoring and manually adjusting the power according to current conditions. (Seat-of-the-pants adjusting, that is.) 100.1 C steam output could then still be possible without violating the laws of thermodynamics. >From Abd: > If he wants us to believe him, he'd behave differently, > I suggest; therefore I conclude that he doesn't care if > we believe him, and he may even be pleased that he's > being so broadly rejected. If he were a simple scammer, > by the way, he'd not behave this way, most likely. Yup. Keep'em guessin. Meanwhile, keep smoozing with all your financial backers behind closed doors. Get all your ducks lined up. * * * FWIW: My current speculation on Rossi is that, yes, he probably has stumbled across a breakthrough. (Well... I hope so.) However, it would not surprise me if we eventually discover the fact that as history writes the book on this account we learn that the predictability of generating the "Rossi Effect" was still uncomfortably iffy at times. Granted, Rossi may still be light years ahead of all the competition, including BLP. But the speculated unpredictability for which I am proposing here may still have been just enough to cause problems in the design, engineering, and ultimate commercialization of his eCat modules. It still would not surprise me unduly if Defkalion misses their highly anticipated October dog and pony show. I'm willing to wait a reasonable amount of time - to let the fix the bugs. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
