I would expect that the 1MW demo will not involve a phase-change in the calorimetry. With Defkalion's statements as to alternate coolants being used into a heat-exchanger, and combination heat-and-power models, the questionable Rossi tests will hopefully be rendered obsolete. This is presuming that it's not a scam. The statements of Defkalion, including their alleged liquid-phase-only testing, mean that they've either passed Rossi in development, or they are complicit in propogating misinformation. I find it difficult to believe that the Defkalion Board of Directors could be complicit in such a scam, but a desktop nickel-hydrogen powerplant is tough to swallow, too. I commend Cude in making straighforward, sensible arguments on the steam-issue. But, this dead horse needs a reprieve. October is fast approaching, and Rossi has done nothing to make himself more credible in his past few demonstrations. I don't expect this leopard to change his spots, and cringe when I imagine who will next join his pool of "snakes and clowns." Let's hope that Defkalion's demonstration will leave all of the questions in the dust, and redeem Rossi as simply one of many defensive inventors who lacks people skills.
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:04:26 -0300 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Vo]:How can we make sure that 1MW e-cat is true? > > Dear people, > > How can we make sure that 1MW e-cat is true during a presentation? It > is certainly not hard to emulate the e-cat performance at home with > 600W, 1KW or maybe a laboratory with a 5KW source to heat water. But > for a fake e-cat, it would be required 140KW to 1MW to emulate the big > e-cat. > > If this is a scam, we won't have the means to know that easily in > October with the presentation of the big e-cat. >
