On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:20: Joshua Cude wrote [snip] Are you suggesting that because of the billions gambled on fusion research,
that money should also be invested in perpetual motion claims? [/snip] Joshua, Perpetual motion and violation of COE arguments are fallacious arguments used by skeptics To say you are only allowed to consider "known" types of energy. The fact that some gases never assume a solid state and recent proof that virtual photons can become real by displacing particle pairs with high speed mirrors makes the argument once again that zero point energy is real and that under the right circumstances it can be harvested. That is without even citing all the other anomalous behavior of modified half lives of radioactive gases or claims of anomalous heat. If we had an environment where you could quickly and freely transport gas atoms or molecules between a deep gravity well and a zero gravity zone it wouldn't take very long for someone to exploit it into an energy device. My point is random gas motion is only considered unexploitable because it can't be spatially or thermally organized [Maxwell's demon] but I am suggesting the tapestry of Casimir geometry is equivalent to a free "inertial" shuttle that is transporting these atoms between different gravitational gradients - In this case different gravity hills where we outside the cavity are at the bottom of the well from the atoms perspective. The concept is that the spatial displacement rate can be very low if the normal gravitational gradients are dismissed and sudden jumps in energy density are instead allowed due to Casimir suppression. Regards Fran
