Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]> wrote:
> Isn't it interesting that the only test that had a possibility of actually > showing significant heat not only shows much more heat than the open > demonstrations purport to show, but also involves nobody but involved > persons. That might be interesting if it were true, but it isn't true. The 18-hour test with the large reactor produced about 16 kW, which is about the same as the 12 kW steam test with that gadget a few weeks earlier. Probably the flowing water captured more heat than the steam test, which would explain the difference. You need to stop letting your imagination run away with you. You are finding all kinds of evidence of nefarious activity, but this evidence is a figment of your imagination, or a misunderstanding. > Yup. Would Levi do this? Only if he totally wanted to throw his career in > the trash. So he's not doing it! He's actually publishing nothing. So he did > a private test and saw something of interest. So? > Are you trying to draw conclusions from the fact that a professor of physics has not published results? I know many professors of physics and chemistry. Hundreds of them. Most of them sit on results for months, or years, or decades. As I mentioned, most of them misplace results under piles of paper and debris. The first professor of physics in history was Newton. He reportedly put the most important physics paper in history, *Principia*, in a drawer for months or years, until Halley accidentally heard about it. He would have left it there indefinitely, believe me. I know those people. Newton also invented the half-silvered sextant. The sextant eventually saved thousands of lives and millions of pounds, but no thanks to Newton, who put it aside and told no one about it. It had to be rediscovered by someone else. Thousands of lives and vast fortunes were lost in the meanwhile because he did not feel like taking the trouble to explain what was -- to him -- a mere toy; an unimportant thing. To this day, many scientists share that attitude. I find it annoying. There is no way to know why Levi has not yet published more details. A lot of professors hide good results deliberately, so they can get a jump on the competition. Others simply don't around to publishing because they don't feel like it. - Jed
