Indeed, Krivits psychological interpretation on Mats Lewan's video was so convincing, that I almost believed it! Quite impressive. However, it would be good to have accurate temporal temperature graph for both April E-Cats. If power manipulation hypothesis is true, it should be shown as temperature variations. I do not see that it is possible for Mats to fail to see power manipulation, because he observed two full demonstrations.
—Jouni On Aug 10, 2011 6:33 AM, "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[email protected]> wrote: > At 11:56 PM 8/8/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: > >>Abd ul-Rahman, in this reasoning is one problem, >>that it was not Rossi who exaggerated the test >>results, but those independent and >>semi-independent (levi) scientists, who made all >>the calculations. They could have made it right >>from the beginning, but they decided that they >>can assume that E-Cat works in normal pressure, >>what is itself ridiculous assumption by Galantini et al. > > Rossi is highly involved. He set up the > conditions to suck experts into blessing his > invention. And Rossi has made the same calculations. Remember the Krivit video? > >>E.g. Mats Lewan calculated that outlet hose was >>submerged into condensated water in the bucket >>in depth ca. 20 cm, and calculated that this >>will increase internal pressure or water boiling >>temperature by 0.5°C. But failed to see that >>most of the pressure is due that large amounts >>of steam tries to come away from E-Cat via small >>orifice (ø5-10 mm). And indeed, kilowatt range steaming is lots of steam! > > Indeed. > >>As Rossi is innocent, i think that it is a false >>argument to use this exaggeration as an evidence for a fraud. > > What pushed me over the edge into a fraud > conclusion was his manipulation of the power, > apparently to increase steam output for Lewan to > video. Jouni, he was hiding that. Lewan came back > more quickly than he expected. At least that is the strong appearance. > >>On the contrary, this sloppy science is good >>evidence that E-Cat is real, because if there >>was a hidden power source, rossi would make >>demonstrations where every joule of hidden >>hydrogen bottle would be utilizad for fraud, but >>now we know only that E-Cat produced only >>something like 40-80% of alleged output, but it >>is difficult to know for sure how much because >>of sloppy measurements. This does not sound >>rational and convincing way to construct a hoax! > > Jouni, you are falling into the same error as > many, assuming that Rossi is rational! There is lots of evidence he is not. >
