> On 08/10/2011 03:54 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: > [snip]Albert Einstein might be astonished to learn that NASA physicists have applied > his relativity theory to a concept he introduced but later disliked namely > that > two particles that interact could maintain a connection even if separated > by > a vast distance. Researchers often refer to this connection as > "entanglement."[snip] > > > > I would suggest that the separation over vast distances is only spatial and that both particles are "entangled" by their temporal coordinates - We > know that the time axis can appear like a normal spatial axis to a local observer as you approach C and my guess is these entangled particles would appear to "grow together" from the perspective of an observer approaching C. Spatially the particles are pivoting from a common time coordinate.
Yes. Better said, manifestation in tri-dimensional space, happening, occurring, or becoming in time, surges or comes from a "common ground" which is neither spatial (in the tri-dimensional spatial sense) nor temporal. Time (local time) is in fact not more than the consequence or result of the speed of that spatial manifestation. That's why local time (and local space) are affected in turn by the speed of the frame in which the manifestation is happening. And that's also the reason why we cannot in principle directly or absolutely detect those changes. That's what I call a physically sound interpretation of special relativity and equivalent theories. Entanglement would be the manifestation of an unique subjacent reality, in two or more spatial locations. And being unique, happening at the same time. A particle entangled in a frame at a given frame velocity, would therefore, at least in principle, have original time and spatial distortions which are similar in all its manifestations. Although it will also probably be subjected to local distortions if there are different frame velocities. It will carry a timing fingerprint of the velocity of the frame at which it was originally entangled, so to speak. So: As long as the velocities of all the frames at which the particle is manifesting are equal (like in the proposed experiment in my paper), those manifestations will therefore be simultaneous, in an absolute, not relative, sense. Regards, Mauro > Regards > Fran >
