>From Daniel > I think with so much money invested and nothing delivered, > no independent tests whatsoever, it is hard to think this > is not a scam.
I disagree. There is also some disagreement on the aspect of how one determines an "independent test." BLP would say yes "independent tests" have been performed. Skeptics, OTOH, would cry foul. IMO, BLP is an honorable company. They believe in their product. What remains to be seen is whether BLP can deliver on their vision. I would speculate that the BLP process, whatever that process might be, is largely defined by perceptions laid out in Randy's grandiose CQM theory. Personally, my perception of CQM is that it probably does reveal certain secrets (extraordinarily so) as to what's happening on the atomic scale. However, that does not necessarily mean that ALL the "secrets" as revealed in the CQM book are accurate. > ... They would easily have money to test all > other theories of LENR and come with something useful. It is not in BLP's invested interest to test other theories. As far as BLP is concerned CQM is the only way to go. From their perspective, why bother giving lip service to false prophets. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen who the false prophets are. Often, it's the prophets themselves who turn out to be the last to discover the falseness of their claims. In the end, BLP may still surprise us. They may still pull something interesting out of the hat. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
