Peter,
Interesting idea... The molecular sieves would be mixed in
during production of the final powder in an oxygen free glovebox to form a
sieve layer that keeps oxygen out so that the bulk powder can remain ultra
activated even when exposed to air because only atomic hydrogen can diffuse
through it? So even though not itself a catalyst it maintains the catalyst...
as I have said before, I think ultra active geometry is being spontaneously
formed and self destructing around us all the time because by its very nature
it is creating stiction forces that want to be satisfied. so if something
serves the purpose of extending the lifespan of said geometry it should be
considered a catalytic amplifier.
Regards
Fran
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi quotes
How could they know that it was air in the reactor? I
If it was how can 50 cc air be transforrned in a small
impurity? Why does noiw Rossi say he is flushing too?
Lack of reliable, serious data. Or the additive (not catalyst)
can be molecular sieves?
Kullander and Essen could know, in case they have received a real cell with the
original core material for
analysis- but I doubt, how could they find natural isotopic distribution of Ni
and Cu?
Peter
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Peter Heckert
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Kullander and Essen reported, that the reactor was not flushed.
<http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.><http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.>
Page 2 , "Startup":
"The air of atmospheric pressure was remaining in the container as a small
impurity."
Am 09.09.2011 06:18, schrieb Peter Gluck:
I have found this as interesting too, because Rossi has
repeatedly suggested that his system can tolerate air in contact with the core
material:
* Andrea Rossi
September 4th, 2011 at 3:17
PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68499>
Dear Alan De Angelis:
We have to purge also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
* Alan DeAngelis
September 4th, 2011 at 1:33
PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=6#comment-68481>
Dear Ing. Rossi:
I'm just curious. When organic chemists do catalytic hydrogenations (with
palladium, nickel, et cetera) in a pressurized
shakerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogenation they first purge air out of
the system by cycling back and forth between vacuum (with a vacuum pump) and
hydrogen several times before they finally pressurize with hydrogen. Do you do
this with the E-Cat or do you just blow the air out with some hydrogen and go
straight to the pressurization? (Don't feel obliged to answer this if it would
reveal too much about the process.)
All the best,
Alan DeAngelis
According to Piantelli (see WO 2010/058288 for example) deep degassing is a
sine qua non condition of success/reproducibility because gas molecules
adsorbed on the active clusters compete with hydrogen.
Peter
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Jed sez:
> Alan: Thanks again for monitoring Rossi's blog.
It's a dirty job and Alan is the right man to do it.
I ditto Jed's sentiments.
Thanks, Alan.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com<http://www.OrionWorks.com>
www.zazzle.com/orionworks<http://www.zazzle.com/orionworks>
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
