Could be significant. LOL. With the glitches and inaccuracies I see in this data I doubt anything that small could be considered significant. I doubt there is even hydriding occuring. Thermal inertis explains it. Definitely I won;t let you ascribe a 0.7C for < 5 min glitch to CF. That would be impossible to justify at this point as it would with even a pronounced anomaly. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jed Rothwell To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 5:02 PM Subject: [Vo]:Lewan report corrected
A new version of this report has been uploaded: Test of Energy Catalyzer, Bologna, September 7, 2011 Analysis of calorimetry http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3264365.ece/BINARY/Report+E-cat+test+September+7+%28pdf%29 The new version says QUOTE: 22:35 Power to the resistance was cut off. Input AC current was 0.11 A. Over-all AC voltage was 232 volts. DC voltage was zero. AC current through the resistance was 0.11 A. T2=29.0°C, T3=133.0°C. (Typo corrected Sept 14). 22:40 T2=28.9°C, T3=133.7°C. 22:50 T2=28.8°C, T3=131.2°C. END QUOTE There is a slight temperature rise at 22:40. Could be significant. I would like to see second-by-second data after the power cut off. - Jed
