2011/9/16 Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]>:

> Electric power was just less than 10% of the core
> heat production that was still increasing and as there is lots of
> thermal inertia, it could absorb 2.5 kW loss of heating power that we
> did not even notice it.
>

Here was mistake, I of course meant that electric power was just less
than 20% of core heat production.

Still I find it baffling why there was no bump in the graph, when
power was cut off? Do you Alan or anyone else have any ideas?

http://i.imgur.com/lU42G.png

–Jouni

Reply via email to