On 11-09-20 02:48 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Excuses, excuses, excuses, piled on more excuses for using methods
which produce no reliable conclusions, for taking shortcuts around
things so simple teenagers can do them, and not diligently working to
disprove claims. How sad. I suppose you don't think you need bother
with calibration control runs to check calorimetry methods. Must be
true if quality calorimetry is never applied I guess. Doing accurate
calorimetry could prove embarrassing I suppose, so why bother spending
time and money on that? With such bad calorimetry methods applied so
far there is a risk it could all be merely a big systematic mistake.
That would be so inconvenient to discover.
Well, I've made an attempt to provide what benefit I can from of my
little experiences doing free energy experiments, and spending 15
years discussing things just like this. I'm not sure why I posted at
all on this. I suppose it present some fun problems and an
opportunity to learn. Hopefully, my posting has contributed to the
gestalt of the list.
Dunno about anyone else, but I've certainly read -- and appreciated --
your posts on this, Horace. Thank you!
As to Jouni ... well, I plonked him quite a while back and haven't read
any of his posts since.
