My Two Cents:
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.
Most of the previous experimental problems were solved in this setup. We
could've seen measurable, stable, power gains completely unaffected by
phase-change or water overflow. We should have been presented with an
operating E-Cat producing 6 or more times input power. Instead, we were asked
to evaluate a temperature decay of an E-Cat, whose power output was at or near
parity with the input, while a new device "produces frequencies."
The only explanation that I can come up with is this:
Rossi was originally claiming a MINIMUM of 6x power gains. Skeptics said,
"Then why do you need two heaters? Even with an 80% loss in thermoelectric
power generation, it should be able to run self-sustained." Of course skeptics
MEANT that you could generate electricity with the output heat, and use it to
power the heaters. This would close the loop, and allow it to run ad infinitum;
much crow would be eaten.
Rossi couldn't be bothered with thermoelectric generators, and tried to come up
with a way for it to "run without input".
I'd predicted that the "self-sustained" or "heat after death" mode of operation
would be a bone of contention. Let's just look hard at "Heat-Before-Death".
It's obviously not his promised 6x power gain, but there may be something to
this, yet.
Donating to the World - Two Cents at a Time,
R.L.
> There is no reason I can think of why Rossi would not do his best
> for this demo, but what he came up with was almost a joke,
> presumably because he could not come up with anything better.
>
