I sometimes wonder if the breakup between Rossi and Defkalion is just a charade, like the demo Rossi made for Krivit.
Harry On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:40 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very interesting letter indeed. > > Regarding the following excerpt: > >> In all such cases, had there been close cooperation with >> Defkalion to develop the technology together, as opposed >> to focusing and putting pressure on us to receive money, >> many of these unfortunate legal and technical >> misunderstandings could have been avoided. >> >> As such, all these created serious delays for all >> contractual parties and for payment to be made according >> to our contract. You will safely recall that payment is >> based on the successful demonstration according to >> protocols and procedures that have been supplied to EFA, >> whose conditions have not been met yet. > > It may be a matter of interpretation, one mired in legal jargon no > doubt, as to whether RA actually supplied "...successful demonstration > according to protocols and procedures that have been supplied to EFA." > > Obviously DGT sez no, while I presume AR will say that he did... so > where's my money. Meanwhile, I get the impression that DGT is > monumentally strapped for cash. Under the circumstances they could > either pay AR what he thinks is owed to him, or DGT can redirect what > limited financial resources they might still have left in the piggy > bank towards completing their on-going R&D efforts - while > simultaneously asking AR to just be a little more patient a while > longer. Who's going to win this battle? I fear it won't be AR. Ya > know, I'm sort of finding myself sympathizing more with DGT than with > AR on this one. > > Don't change that channel folks! > > Regards > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > >
