Am 14.10.2011 16:56, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
From hence forth they tend to advertise only the observations that
support the premise that Rossi is a "fraudster." Observations that
may suggest Rossi's work might actually possess merit are
conveniently ignored and/or glossed over.
In this case, the skeptics are ignoring the fact that the heat
increased during heat after death, instead of declining according to
Newton's law. This proves they are wrong. I have not seen a response
from any of them trying to explain this fact.
This is not ignored.
If he makes a 3 degree error in temperature measurement, this reduces
the energy by more than 50%.
Heat after death is then easier to explain and all calculations how much
fuel or current is needed are then invalid.
Temperature measurement is essential to this experiment. It is the
central point.
He must not only do this correctly, he must also do this in such a way
that nobody can doubt it.
If he is unable to make correct energy and temperature measurements then
his whole research must be doubted.
Rossi said "this is enough to convince unbiased people". What are
unbiased people? This are people, that dont think much and that dont ask
much and that believe any nonsense. Everybody else is biased in some way.
"Enough for unbiased folks" is not enough in science and technology. He
must make the plane fly.
*It must be enough for biased people.*
Steve Krivit was so anxious to gloss over the facts, he did not even
notice the flow calorimetry was working before heat after death began,
and that output balanced input.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Everybody has bright spots and everybody has blind spots. This is a
known truth. Blind spots are not bad will. This is just natural.
He must not polarize, he must convince, like the Wright brothers did.
Best,
Peter
