I'm sorry, but how does Stremmenos' letter ruin Rossi's chances of obtaining damages?
Sent from my iPhone. On Oct 13, 2011, at 15:42, "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Thanks, Akira ... More drama indeed! Move over, James Bond there is new > poker-faced gambler in town. > > This is looking almost like financial suicide on Rossi's part (assuming DGT > is not bluffing). AR has made all the wrong strategic moves and with > mind-boggling naiveté. In contrast, the low key and well-worded response from > DGT is superbly crafted from a legal standpoint, whereas everything coming > from the Rossi camp is self-inflicted damage. > > Could Stemmenos end up being a double-agent or "plant" from Defkalion, whose > main function has been to cleverly and completely eliminate any chance of > Rossi obtaining damages for breach of contract? If so, Stemmenos has > performed admirably. > > It is easily possible that DGT may NOT have had money problems after all, but > nevertheless desperately wanted to wiggle their way out of an expensive 100 > million Euro contract and when Rossi could not meet a milestone, they say an > opening. Apparently DGT also discovered an alternative technology to E-Cat - > and they accomplished this in a most impressive fashion by tricking Rossi > into believing that he still had the upper hand, since he had never disclosed > the secret ... which may not have been so valuable, after all. > > Apparently DGT discovered either the secret catalyst itself, or more likely a > substitute, and on their own initiative; and Rossi refuses to understand > this. Rossi has been played. He apparently even wants to hire away the > scientist who found the alternative process. Pity. > > IMO - the past several months may have cost Rossi most of the value of > whatever he had to begin with, in terms of value of IP - even if we discount > the ludicrous and unenforceable patent. He has been set-up in such an > artistic fashion by his opponents that he is still in the dark just as Act > 111 is nearly complete ... and miraculously does not realize that he (EFA, > Leonardo, Ampenergo, etc) and NOT his former associates violated the terms of > the agreement - and therefore cannot collect either Royalties or the huge > lump sum payment, while at the same time allowing DGT to compete worldwide > (instead of just that valuable Balkan market :) > > ... and now we learn DGT may compete with what is claimed to be a superior > product. Plus, DGT can now redirect that 100 million Euro into a factory and > distribution network of their own. They have seem to have pulled off a > real-life Casino Royale. > > Of course, this conclusion is valid only if DGT has indeed duplicated the > technology successfully. > > Given the circumstances, it seems at least arguable that they have done this, > and that Stemmenos may have been their ace-in-the-hole, so to speak. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Akira Shirakawa > A translation has been posted today on 22passi instead: > > http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/10/stremmenos-stance-on-defkalion-gts-10.html > > Cheers, > S.A. > > >
