Am 17.10.2011 19:20, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint:
Peter left out one minor detail...

The purpose of a scam is to make money at other people's expense... If the 1MW 
demo fails, nobody gets paid, and Rossi has just FLUSHED his entire net worth 
down the drain.
I dont think about this. It happens quite often that people do something thats hard to understand, and I am aware that I cannot understand everybody.
I doubt it’s a scam, but it most certainly can be that because of poor testing 
procedures, Rossi has tricked himself into believing that this is real, and he 
has been so convinced of that that he feels he doesn't need to do meticulous 
testing...
The problem is, that they claim they have heated an office before.
Rossi also claimed before they had done mass flow calorimetry before.
If so, they must have a lot of experience.

If this all is true then I cannot believe this latest demonstration. Why dont they place the thermo-sensors in a larger distance where error is impossible? Did they do their previous measurements and the whole development and optimization in the same risky way?

The water cannot loose much energy if he had placed the sensors some cm away. In any commercial central heating system the heat is still there meters away at the heat radiators. Doesnt he know that energy cannot vanish?

If they want to go commercial why didnt they demonstrate a commercial usable form of heat, eg 60° or more? This would also be MUCH easier to measure and with higher undeniable evidency.

Everything what they do appears unlogical to me if this really work and if they really want to commercialise this.

Also Rossi often says, he is not a "mediatist", he doesnt want publicity, he doesnt care about opinions of others. Now, if this is true then he cannot go the commercial route. Then he must go the scientific route. But for this, his measurement methods are too crappy.

There is nothing with all that that makes real sense to me.
Maybe he is a genius-inventor and a little bit mad, as it is often the case with inventors and geniusses.

Best,

Peter

Reply via email to