>From the teslafy wayback machine;
Wed Sep 23, 2009

Brother Robert Norris and I attended the weeklong celebration in Auburn Ind 
from Sept 2-9 or so.. The museum itself occupied many hours... Many Parked 
Auburns were on display downtown. These used "ACTUAL" generators in the 
automobiles. These are the old style electrical machines that employ actual 
rotating magnets, instead of todays convenient version of the regulated 
rotating electromagnet via slip rings known as the alternator.

What this means is that on these old style automobiles the engine horsepower is 
being continually dragged down by the demand of the generator; and an external 
voltage regulator was used to keep the battery from becoming overcharged. The 
advent of the alternator instead was heralded as a great advance where instead 
of a rotating magnet to convey the mechanical to electrical conversion, instead 
the rotating magnetism part becomes either an energized or non-energized 
rotating electromagnet., and then we can manufacture the electrical generation 
when we need it, but crucially,PERHAPS NOT AS EFFICIENTLY.

Now in the Auburn-Cord Museum it was shown that this company first innovated 
the concept of "supercharging" automobile engines. A portion of the mechanical 
output energy of the crankcase rotation was used to "mechanically" power 
another air compressor to alter the ordinary atmospheric pressure differences 
existing on the intake manifold between the combustion chambers cyclic 
activity. A pressurized combustion yields more horsepower out despite the fact 
that a portion of output energy is used to enable the increased efficiency, 
which apparently enables a net gain.

The successor to this idea is turbo-charging, where the actual exhaust pressure 
of the engine turns a sort of compressor.

Now a new idea emerges whereby now a portion of the mechanical conversion 
energy of the rotating part of the engine that eventually turns the wheels of 
your automobile is diverted to a new circumstance of great proportions: THAT OF 
TAKING YOUR IN-EFFICIENT ALTERNATOR AND MAKING HYDROXY FUEL TO THE ENGINE AS AN 
ADDED FUEL MIXTURE.

Now even though it is recognized that the output energy is less then the input 
energy for the water electrolysis cases generally considered as exothermic; 
Again this factor used as a FEEDBACK LOOP for another engine process raises 
questions about the possible increases of efficiencies to gained by another 
adjacent "higher energy flow" machine next to a comparably lower one that 
itself uses the lower energy flow as the one for its regulation.

Thus it becomes conceivable that the energy spent as the output diversion is 
less then that regained on the total operation, with a net gain of energy 
manifestation or flow. is evidenced on both the supercharged and turbocharging 
designs.

So then we begin to wonder cannot the same thing be described and done 
efficiently electrically?

In the old days they didn't know what to do with the excess energy a generator 
supplied, so they essentially threw it away as heat losses on circuits made so 
that the voltage to the battery was "regulated" not overcharged.

In contrast had water fuel technology been applied in those days, we would 
still be driving Auburn's and Cord's to this day.

This is for the simple fact that the generator is more efficient in mechanical 
conversion of energy into its electrical counterpart, where here that 
electrical counterpart is CRUCIAL to the amount of hydroxy mix admitted to the 
engine itself. The ones that are now doing this and showing up to a 45% 
increase of efficiency using an alternator should know that if they simply 
replaced that alternator with a bona-fide generator as these displayed 
Auburn-Cord Automobiles use, a major increase in further efficiency might 
evidence itself!!!

You see now with the advent of water fuel technology, the use of a constant 
draw electrical device such as the generator, once considered bothersome at low 
rpms ect, and negotiated out of existance by rotating electromagnet alternators 
to be turned off and on by demand: NOW THE OLD SCHOOL METHOD OF ELECTRICAL 
CONVERSION BECOMES VALUABLE BY ITS INHERENT EFFICIENCY OF DELIVERY, ESPECIALLY 
IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT IT IS BEING EMPLOYED IN A FEEDBACK LOOP WITH THE MUCH 
LARGER HORSEPOWER ENGINE IN COORDINATION; EXACTLY NOW AS A NEW ELECTRICAL 
SUPERCHARGER!

This concept in development from several years ago is now generally abandoned 
due to lack of funds. Heres a 10 hp motor using PMA  to generate gas;
http://youtu.be/U3ZVWOsYE_I
10 hp motor operation/QC-12 PMA/ 30 VDC Cylindrical Series Cells. At 2:51 the 
volume of gas flow is shown for ten seconds in close up. Also here's my late 
brother detonating a controlled explosion;
RWN as Bag Man, at 0:00 2 ft. explosion is visible
http://youtu.be/t4ESF4yVbOk

Now an expert in the field of motors who prototyped my six phase alternator  
system Larry Solak of Mantua, Ohio who runs Solak's Automotive Specialties 
voiced the opinion to me that the gas flow from the electrolysisor is miniscule 
in comparison to the atmospheric gas flow that is normally required for the 
automobile intake, therefore it shouldn't make much of a difference efficiency 
or horsepower wise. But that may only apply to ordinary alternator designs, not 
here what is available by use of a permanent magnet alternator(PMA) It would 
seem to me that the device is outputing a significant flow of gas, and that if 
it were instead added to a car engine as an independent component, that 
addition of hydroxy to the input should be much higher% wise then shown in 
typical alternator designs. So here I have done the work to show what a 10 hp 
conversion of mechanical energy to hydroxy fuel flow looks like.

Now coming to the subject of trains, as we know they are already a producer of 
electric energy in their diesel/ electric motor conversions. If all this 
hydroxy business were true, here you have a device whereby the primary motive 
source is itself electrical, so why not divert a portion of that electrical 
energy to alter the conditions of its incoming fuel/air mixture? Hydroxy 
schemes have been noted to be especially efficient with diesel engines.
Sincerely HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/

Reply via email to