<[email protected]> wrote:

> >The only part I do not get is: Why 1 MW? 10 kW is just as persuasive.
> There
> >is probably a ~$500 billion marketplace for small reactors, say from 1 to
> 50
> >kW.
>
> Current world population is about 7 billion. Divided by 3 gives roughly 2
> billion households. 2 billion home power units @ $2000 each is 4 trillion
> dollars + maintenance income.
>

I meant presently. At this moment the sales of small reactors and heat
engines is very roughly ~$500 billion, I estimate. Mostly automobile
engines, but also <70 kW generators ($6 billion -- for some reason industry
sources quote it as less than 70 kW), small gasoline motors for pumps,
blowers, farm equipment and so on, and -- I guess you can add -- water
heaters, furnaces, kilns, drying equipment and so on.

The present market is gigantic. The future market will be far larger, partly
at the expense of the megawatt-scale reactors.

By the way, $4 trillion is inaccurate. To get annual sales, you have to
divide by 20 because your 2 billion households do not have to buy a new
reactor every year. They buy one every ~20 years, so that's 100 million home
power units sold per year, for $200 billion. Automobiles do not last 20
years. It is reasonable to suppose sales will remain at 77 million per year.
Assuming automotive cold fusion cells can be sold at a premium, for around
$2000 each for a long time, that's another $154 billion. Add in water
heaters, ovens, kilns, air conditioners, refrigerators and pretty soon you
are talking real money. Back up to the trillions.

I'll tell what irks me. People such Patterson used to fight over imaginary
fractions of this future market share. Patterson and Reding wanted to make
sure they got 100%, instead of 65% or 10%. We are talking about the
royalties from a trillion dollars in sales, and they were arguing about what
percent they got, and scheming to keep others from getting interested in the
technology and entering the market. That's why they put on a half-assed,
unconvincing demo for Motorola. They *told* me that was the reason! I could
hardly believe my ears. I told them that was about the dumbest thing I ever
heard, and to this day, it still is.

Here they were looking at the biggest opportunity in the history of
commerce. During the life of the intellectual property they would have
earned billions, and perhaps even become the first trillionairs in history.
They both went to the grave without a penny of income from it because they
were so greedy, so short-sighted, and so blind to opportunity. And the rest
of us lost any chance of using the technology, probably despite Miley's best
efforts.

Rossi has done some stupid things, but nothing 0.001% as stupid as that.

- Jed

Reply via email to