Wouldn't US Navy have clear grounds to test nuclear devices on US soil? Why would they test the device in Italy?
It seems that they didnt't went thru with US-soil-based test because nuclear-device testing in the US is forbidden for private entities. I ask myself if that's the case for the US Navy. 2011/10/25 Axil Axil <[email protected]> > There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi’s customer in this > week’s upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable. > > With the fragmentary background that Rossi has let slip during the last > year regarding US government knowledge and participation in the development > of the E-Cat, the US Navy would be the obvious US government point > organization and primary customer for the E-Cat. > > First off, it would be extremely difficult for any one commercial company > to bring the E-Cat to market. It would take many years or decades to > safely commercialize the E-Cat and loads of up upfront money. > > The Greeks are out of their heads if they think that people would put a > nuclear reactor in their basements or that the IAEA would allow it. > > Next, the megawatt size reactor format is the right power level for > utilization of Ni power by the military. From way back, Rossi has targeted > his design and development toward this large size reactor power format. It > is perfectly reasonable that this design emphasis was inspired by the needs > of the US Military. > > Furthermore, if the E-Cat showed any indications of working in those early > government trials and demos which we suspect were conducted, the Navy would > be aware of them, and made it their business to closely monitor the progress > of Rossi’s R&D. The US government monitors of Rossi’s development would have > encouraged the emphasis of the megawatt size format. > > > The US Navy will do a good job at protecting the design of the E-Cat from > international competition both commercial and military since this technology > would be critical and decisive to national defense. A private company would > never be permitted to broadcast this critical military technology around the > world nor would a company have the financial resourses to develop a home > safe nuclear product. > > > The Navy is not concerned about the product safety of the E-Cat reactor. > Military personnel endure a high level of on-the-job risk and the E-Cat > though dangerous in itself would tend to lower the overall risk load the war > fighter would be exposed to on the battle field. > > The E-Cat would lower and eventually eliminate the need for fossil fuel in > military operations and mitigate the risk of oil embargo from war > operations. > > > When all the threads of what we know about the history of E-Cat development > are tied together in the framework of US Navy sponsorship and support, the > whole ball of yarn makes sense. > > > But the US military will have a hard time keeping Rossi’s mouth shut. It > will be interesting and amusing to see how the various forces of secrecy in > the government and the flapping lips of Rossi work themselves out. > > > > > >
