David,

               You make a very timely point. Although many of us were
disappointed by the shroud of secrecy suddenly wrapped around the long
touted 1MW test of Rossi it is still additional information that will help
us to unlock the principles behind these anomalies. The 1st and 2nd Rowan
confirmations were what convinced me that the Black Light Process was
legitimate. Although Mills describes everything in terms of catalytic action
there is growing evidence of a relationship between Casimir geometry and
catalytic action. Change in Casimir geometry may in fact be the basis for
catalytic action as indicated by a recent report by Peng Chen at Cornell
<http://www.physorg.com/news159199255.html>   study that catalytic action
only occurs at openings and defects in nanotubes. This reinforces the
working theory that nano powders and skeletal catalysts achieve the same
geometry through an inverse method of packing geometry of powder grains
versus leaching pits where a softer metal is removed from an alloy of itself
with a harder metal. Rossi uses Powder grains larger than most nano powders
but the "roughness" of his powder grains appear to make up for this oversize
grain by  the way these "textured" grains interlock to form a bulk material.
Most researchers agree that some form of agitation is also required to
maintain anomalous operation which would equate to Rossi's need for the
signal generator to keep stimulating the reactor. My thought is that the
agitation changes the Casimir geometry creating catalytic action upon any
gas atoms inside the geometry. The black light plasma is not mentioned in
the Rossi experiments but still I think it is present, In fact, I think it
is present whenever a researcher mentions condensed hydrogen clusters, IRH,
fractional hydrogen or hydrinos along with the odd Balmer line shift of the
frequency spectrum. As pointed out by Mill's Similar frequency shifts might
be expected from hydrogen being ejected from the sun's corona at fractions
of C but if you substitute tritium in his thought experiment you realize
that the half life would be extended by such an excursion while the claims
for condensed forms of hydrogen in a lattice are mostly for accelerated half
lives. This agrees with a paper by professor Jan Naudts ""On the hydrino
state of the relativistic hydrogen atom".
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193v2";  that the hydrino is actually
relativistic and is also supported by Casimir theory that vacuum energy
density is actually changed by Casimir geometry - note the density is
decreased instead of the typical increase we observe when an object
approaches C or equivalently the gravity felt as said object approaches an
event horizon. Since we tend to think of our own slow spatial velocities as
negligible relative to C the idea that any relativistic action could occur
inside a bulk material here on earth seems unlikely because we are
conditioned to expect relativistic motion to be either spatial or equivalent
accelerations on the scale produced by a black hole. The big hint here is
that most claims of significant  half life modifications due to catalytic
actions or Casimir geometry have been for accelerated half lives. This means
that we outside the reactor appear to be approaching C relative to the low
vacuum energy density observer inside the active  geometry of the bulk
material inside the reactor. Since we outside the reactor are almost at a
full stop regarding spatial displacement the most plausible explanation is
that the low density observer is experiencing negative equivalent
acceleration [antigravity] and aging rapidly relative to us outside the
reactor. Basically we are to the hydrino as the Paradox twin approaching C
is to us.

Regards

Fran

 

 

 

 

David ledin
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:44:07 -0700

Validation of New Energy Source from nickel -hydrogen reaction by
Rowan University in 2008.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfjOIoPwolg
 

 

Reply via email to