But the heat from the sun is in form of EM waves whereas in this case it is
already being carried by a convective current and unless it mixes with
surrounding air, the heat will hardly be carried by long IR waves.

2011/10/31 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de>

>  Am 31.10.2011 15:51, schrieb Daniel Rocha:
>
> That is open field and and there was wood surrounding the radiator. And
> even the wood close to were the viewing was done was not close to the
> radiator air exit.
>
>  Not open enough. 470 kW is what comes down to earth surface on 470 m^2 on
> a hot summerday.
> Now imagine this amount of energy concentrated on an area of 47 m^2. And
> this area was less. Probably 25 m^2.
>
>
>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de>
> Date: 2011/10/31
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Video added to NyTeknik report
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
>
>  Am 31.10.2011 15:38, schrieb Daniel Rocha:
>
> 4 m^3/s is not too much. That is a column of 1.6m^2 ascending at 1.6m/s.
> The area that concealed the radiators was much bigger.
>
>
>  I feel a hot stream of air if my car stands in front of the garage, it is
> still hot and the motor fan is running. My car has 55 kW.
>
> Believe me, the ecat was in sustained mode and running for hours.
> Everything in the direct ambient must have been heated up by this air blow.
> There must be MUCH more heat than the Diesel generator was producing at
> this time and this does not stay cool.
>
>
>  2011/10/31 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de>
>
>> They test the temperature at the output pipe, but this does not say much
>> about the energy when the mass flow is not known.
>>
>> When Lewan looked over the fence to the heat dissipators then he should
>> have feeled A LOT of hot air. He did not mention anything.
>>
>> It would be interesting to know. I have calculated there must be more
>> than 4 m^3 of hot air (ambient + 80 degrees) per second.
>> This is assuming that the air was heated by 80 degrees.
>> If it was heated by 40 degrees then there must be 8m^3/s of hot air and
>> so on.
>>
>>
>> Am 31.10.2011 15:10, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
>>
>>  See:
>>>
>>> http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3303682.ece
>>>
>>> The quality of that video is better than the other ones. Lewan held the
>>> camera steady and explained what the viewer is seeing. There is less
>>> background noise.
>>>
>>> By the way, Lewan says he believes input power was measured using the
>>> genset internal meter. This is a highly reliable method.
>>>
>>> The thermocouples used in this test can be seen in Lewan's video. They
>>> are professional quality, and they are properly placed.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to