Jouni,
He has more exclusive material than you can shake a stick at – and a full day
to cover the events properly.
“Words and claims” for UFOs, Yeti and the Loch Ness Monster still get good
coverage on the newswires, so I don’t see how this is any different. In fact,
it’s far more credible in the light of the fact it’s been seen by quite a few
respected individuals from academia.
This “spiking” of an eCat story is not the first instance of this. I have
heard other accounts of stories about the eCat that made it all the way to the
editor and then mysteriously were killed at the last moment.
Craig, I think that Peter is in very difficult situation, because If Andrea did
not provide him any exclusive material, then there is nothing to write. There
is just words and claims but those have zero scientific relevance.
—Jouni
tiistai, 1. marraskuuta 2011 Craig Brown <[email protected]> kirjoitti:
>
> I "Tweeted" PeterSvensson (the AP journalist who attended the 1MW test) to
> ask why AP what exactly had happened to the news report?
> The response was "Sorry, there's nothing I can say at this point".
> Today I recieved some more worrying information from a concerned member of
> the public. He had emailed Kit Frieden and recieved the following response -
> "I’m sorry, but the AP doesn’t discuss its coverage plans with people outside
> the organization."
> I hate to say suppression, but when it looks like a dog, and barks like a
> dog, it's a dog.
> Craig
> Free Energy Truth
>
>
