Steven A. Lawrence has presented a new argument, worthy of the level of critical acumen shown by the very astute Joshua Cude, that Rossi claims a stablility of control of the level of power output that seems unbelievable, given the evident problems of controlling the chaotic output of a very poorly understood process, which in the past has produced dozens of explosions, according to Rossi, and which at the start of this run created enough danger of runaway heat as to make it necessary to reduce power input by half, reducing the claimed output heat by half -- this claim, however, based on the implausible assertion that most of the input water is vaporized... whereas if only tiny percent of the weight of input water is vaporized, then at the low pressures within the over 100 reactors in parallel, the water-steam froth will naturally stay at 105-110 C for 4.5 hours, as observed, coasting on the stored electric energy from the initial heating -- the froth probably is impeding the flow in complex, chaotic ways within the over 100 reactors, so that the single output temperature is some kind of average of over 100 reactors -- any ideas how much boiler scale would build up from the minerals in city water at the places within each reactor that have the slowest water flow and the highest temperatures from the electric heater?
Did the buyer take away the huge eKat in its storage container? within mutual service, Rich Murray
