I wonder if the vortex would consider the following scenario: It has been reported that the ECATs were completely filled with water before the power was applied to the control systems and associated heating elements so I would expect the following to take place. 1). Water starts to overflow all of the ECAT devices after the required number of hours to complete the fill. 2). The water before heating is initiated is cold water from the tank and this also fills the water capture test port attached to the system output steam pipe. 3). This captured water is removed on occasion to allow room for any new water requiring measure. 4). After a fairly long delay following power application to the ECATs, the water begins to get warmer and finally hot at the capture port. 5). The water in the capture device is removed when needed. 6). Finally the ECAT system begins to produce steam. 7). The steam becomes of higher Q as the ECAT system generates more power. 8). Eventually there is very little water appearing within the capture device as the steam quality becomes approximately 100 %. 9). The customer's engineer now makes the reasonable conclusion that the ECAT system is vaporizing all of the water inputted to it and calculates the power as such. 10). This process continues throughout the test period which allows the engineer to compute the energy released by Rossi's device. 11). It appears that the engineer with Rossi's consent was adjusting the input pump flow rate up and down during the test to maintain the best temperature profile possible. Note the saw tooth like temperature changes during the test. 12). If water began to become captured by the indicator tank, then the flow rate would be reduced to compensate. This is a manual control that should be automated in any final product. 13). If the steam output temperature exceeded a desired set point established by Rossi, then the water input flow rate would be increased to absorb the excess energy. 14). The various water input rates is recorded by the customer and the net calculated power is determined to be the approximately 470 kW average value. 15). The hydrogen is then vented and the water input flow rate increased to cease the energy generation and allow the system to cool. The above procedure seems reasonable. If this is in fact the test conducted, then the customer engineer would be convinced that the Rossi device met its requirements. The vapor output would have been proven to be steam. Dave
