Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps you miss the point about the hydrogen. It has to be completely >> removed from the Ni or you may get a cold fusion reaction. It will not be >> blank. >> > > Let's see if that's true. I doubt it. It's easily tested. > No, it is remarkably difficult to test whether the hydrogen is left in the metal. > How about a brand new E-cat? It will be innocent of hydrogen. There's > not a lot of hydrogen in room air. > I doubt they expose the powder to room air. I assume it is shipped in a vacuum or in nitrogen. > I very much doubt that anyone will persuade Rossi to do any sort of blank > test so this is pretty academic at this point. > Actually, he has already done blank tests, including the one on Oct. 6. There are long segments during which input balanced output. Some of these are followed by segments in which the power was turned off and the temperature declined rapidly. There was clearly no anomalous heat being produced during these segments. Those are blanks. There is blank as anything can be. Since you do not accept that data, I'm sure you would not accept any other blank data. You keep repeating this term "blank" like an incantation, as if it had some magical power to bolster data. It does not. It would do nothing to expose a fake. There are two ways to make fake data: 1. Use instruments that have been corrupted and produce fake numbers. To do a blank, you would simply adjust instruments to reflect the true balance between input and output. 2. Install a hidden source of input power. To do a blank with this, you simply turn off the hidden source. - Jed
