On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Berke Durak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyone disputing this is basically claiming that the report is fake > and that Fioravanti doesn't exist or isn't an engineer or became > senile or was on drugs and/or was conspiring with Rossi. > He may also have been careless and/or negligent. Or he may not have known the issues involved in measuring enthalpy from this type of device by methods Rossi allowed. Rossi may have dictated the methodology to be used-- which could have confused Fioravanti. And of course, he could be conspiring with Rossi. That's my favorite theory. Fioravanti supposedly worked for some mystery client. If there was no mystery client, the guy was working for Rossi. If the whole demo was phony, he most likely knew it and had to be a party to it. If that's what happened, I imagine he was very well paid and given some sort of cover story to use if the ruse is discovered eventually.
