the critics could look ok when anomaly was around 20W and below % with old instruments. maybe even critics could not sustain honest check (accusing a chemist of failing heat computation, is like accusing an accountant to break a balance).
with reports, if they are honest, like the one about the test in sweden on the small e-cat, reporting 25kW anomaly, any chemical process is insufficient. maybe we should find, scientifically, why this domain could not , and still cannot convince, despite much better proof than many well funded science domain, that play with model, uncertain data, hazardous proxy measures. despite the fact that instead of costing trillions , it cost few billions, for an easy checkable result... could be interesting in human systems engineering (some people call that sociology). really I don't understand current situation, and why people are not massively interested... 8-/ I feel as if I missed something, about CF or about humanity. 2011/11/25 Rich Murray <[email protected]> > [ summary of critique: > ... as usual in LENR > research, an enthusiastic team created a "black" witch's cauldron, > full of impurities, sealed and invisible to detailed observation > during months of cooking in H2 gas at high temperatures. > > Probably, corrosion opened up additional conducting paths, reducing > the total electrical resistance fed by the constant voltage power > supply, increasing the total input electric power via increased > current flow, which increased ordinary electric heat effects in > complex ways within the black box. > ... > >
