I wrote: You have a talent for non sequiturs. You are talking about a COMPLETELY > UNRELATED topic. To review: > > Topic 1. The use of Bushnell's statement in this brochure, and how that > might be treated in a court case. >
I meant in a court case in which Bushnell or NASA is suing to have the statement removed. Their right to have it removed would not be contingent on the company using the brochure for a nefarious purpose. Topic 2. A hypothetical court case relating to whether the Rossi device is > real or not, and whether Rossi or Hydrofusion is committing fraud. > I mean in a court case in which the company is accused of fraud. The brochure might be entered as evidence of fraud, but the fact that it quotes Bushnell would not be. Anyone can quote him. I could put his statement on the front of LENR-CANR.org with impunity. A web site opposed to cold fusion could also freely quote him. (I do not know of any web sites opposed to cold fusion other than Wikipedia and Robert Park's columns.) - Jed
