Hey Frank,
Please don't get me wrong. I wish you all the success possible, and I will not be negative towards your hypothesis in any way- if and when if it can be shown to work predicatively. Maybe that is too much to ask. However, the last "100 years" does cover a lot of prime territory in scientific advancement, including relativity, QM, string theory, electro-gravity, etc. Are you certain you are not being a little too generous in this self-appraisal, given the paucity of validation ? In fact, I wish that your simple formula did work in a way that was "not retrospective" and not iffy (with fudge factors many orders of magnitude) and not coincidental - and most of all: had demonstrable predictive power, since it would help with so many things. BTW - to fill us in on the last few years which have pushed you over the top, apparently - have you been able to predict anything previously unknown, based on the megahertz-meter theory ? You mentioned in an earlier post that you had been doing lab work recently - do you have real data that shows how this knowledge has guided you to achieve fabulous results ? If so, please elaborate. That kind of thing would change opinions, and put us kibitzers in their proper groveling places at the feet of the great master. Geeze . if we could somehow merge you and Rossi into one mega-genius, wow, just think of the possibilities? Jones From: [email protected] Any Vorts who want a copy of my article in Science and Society winter addition. Write to me I will send pdf. I know Jones will come down on me for saying this, however, it is one of the greatest works in 100 years. Frank Znidarsic
