Read the comments in this interview and substitute e-cat with i-pad or any tech device that a normal company would sell. Does it work? Well, it is up to Steve Jobs to make sure it works. No, it doesn't.
It is absurd. G. http://coldfusiondevices.com/cold-fusion/swedish-physicists-behind-ecat-com On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Rich Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > A primer for electroweak induced low-energy nuclear reactions, > Srivastava, Widom, Larsen 2010 October: Rich Murray 2011.11.26 > > Reedited for clarity -- also helps me integrate the many ideas... > > Three ring circus ! > What does Hagelstein think? > Is neutron production via spark exploded wires reported by many > independent labs? > How hard would this be for amateurs? > Could tiny experiments generate neutrons at low costs and high safety? > What would happen if a wire was embedded in a diamond anvil hyper > pressure cell and spark exploded? > > > http://www.ias.ac.in/pramana/v75/p617/fulltext.pdf > A primer for electroweak induced low-energy nuclear reactions > Y N SRIVASTAVA 1;¤, A WIDOM 2 and L LARSEN 3 > 1 Dipartimento di Fisica & INFN, Universitµa degli Studi di Perugia, > 06123 Perugia, Italy > 2 Physics Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA > 3 Lattice Energy LLC, 175 North Harbor Drive, Chicago, IL 60601, > USA¤Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] > > MS received 28 January 2010; revised 9 May 2010; accepted 21 May 2010 > > Abstract. > Under special circumstances, electromagnetic and weak interactions can > induce low-energy nuclear reactions to occur with observable rates for > a variety of processes. > A common element in all these applications is that the electromagnetic > energy stored in many relatively slow-moving electrons can ( under > appropriate circumstances ) be collectively transferred into fewer, > much faster electrons withenergies sufficient for the latter to > combine with protons (or deuterons, if present) to produce neutrons > via weak inter-actions. > The produced neutrons can then initiate low-energy nuclear reactions > through further nuclear transmutations. > The aim of this paper is to extend and enlarge upon various examples > analysed previously, present order of magnitude estimates for each and > to illuminate a common unifying theme amongst all of them. > Keywords. Nuclear transmutations; low-energy nuclear reaction; electroweak. > > ...6. Summary and concluding remarks > We can summarize by saying that three seemingly diverse physical > phenomena, viz., metallic hydride cells, exploding wires and the solar > corona, do have a unifying theme. > Under appropriate conditions which we have now well delineated, in all > these processes electromagnetic energy gets collectively harnessed to > provide enough kinetic energy to a certain fraction of the electrons > to combine with protons(or any other ions present) and produce > neutrons through weak interactions. > The produced neutrons then combine with other nuclei to induce > low-energy nuclear reactions and transmutations. > Lest it escape notice let us remind the reader that all three > interactions of the Standard Model (electromagnetic, weak and nuclear) > are essential for an understanding of these phenomena. > Collective effects, but no new physics for the acceleration of > electrons beyond the Standard Model needs to be invoked. We have seen, > however, that certain paradigm shifts are necessary. > On the surface of a metallic hydride cell with surface plasmon > polariton modes, protons collectively oscillate along with the > electrons. > Hence, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (which assumes that the > proton is rigidly fixed) breaks down andshould not be employed. > Similarly, in the solar corona, the electronic density and the > electrical conductivity are sufficiently low. > Hence there is not much charge screening of the electric fields involved. > Strong electric fields generated by time-dependent magnetic fields > through Faraday's laws are sustained in the corona, and the betatron > (or transformer) mechanism remains functional. > Were it not so, electrons and protons could not have been accelerated > to hundreds of GeVs and there would have been no production of > high-energy muons, certainly not copious enough > Pramana { J. Phys., Vol. 75, No. 4, October 2010 635 > to have reached Earth in sufficient numbers to have been observed by > the L3+C collaboration at LEP [23] or by the BAKSAN underground > laboratory [47]. > We are unaware of any other alternative scheme for obtaining this result. > The betatron mechanism also naturally explains a variety of observed > experimental results such as unexpected nuclear transmutations and > high-energy cosmic rays from the exterior of the Sun or any other > astronomical object endowed with strong enough magnetic activity such > as active galactic nuclei. > Also, our estimate of the muons detected at CERN are consistent with > the CERN data on the Solar flare of 14 July2000. > The analysis presented in this paper leads us to conclude that > realistic possibilities exist for designing LENR devices capable of > producing `green energy', that is, production of excess heat at low > cost without lethal nuclear waste,dangerous gamma-rays or unwanted > neutrons. > The necessary tools and the essential theoretical know-how to > manufacture such devices appear to be well within the reach of the > technology available now. > Vigorous efforts must now be made to develop such devices whose > functionality requires all three interactions of the Standard Model > acting in concert. > [ End ] > >
