On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:34 AM, [email protected] wrote:
There are two forces at work in the nucleus. The strong and the
electromagnetic. In ordinary hot fusion only the static
electrostatic repulsion and the static strong nuclear attraction
are considered.
There are other induced forces the electromagnetic and the dynamic
strong nuclear spin orbit "magnetic". These are never considered
and may be mutable. An increase in the magnitude of the spin orbit
would tend to flip nucleons and lead to beta decay. Magnetism is
not conserved and is mutable.
I am at work however nothing yet. Its not easy. I don't like
Aherns patent application, he tries to patent everything from grain
size to ultrasonic stimulation. What about the people who have
pioneered and have been working with these techniques years ago? He
needs to make an original contribution and patent that.
Frank
Magnetic orbitals involving electrons with either deuterons, protons,
or positive quarks, are the *essence* of Deflation Fusion concepts. See:
http://www.mtaonline.net/%7Ehheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionSpreadDualRel.pdf
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflateP1.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FusionUpQuark.pdf
The magnetic force due to spin coupling is a 1/r^4 force, while the
Coulomb force is a 1/r^2 force. At close radii, the magnetic binding
between electron and nucleating particle greatly exceeds the Coulomb
force, though magnetically bound orbitals are intrinsically unstable,
due to their 1/r^4 nature. The hydrogen electron is momentarily
bound to its nucleus in a very small magnetic orbital periodically,
but briefly, on the order of an attosecond. This is the deflated
state. This magnetically bound small state, being neutral, but
having a very large magnetic moment for a nucleus, has a
significant probability of tunneling to any adjacent nucleus that has
a magnetic moment. The magnetic gradients provide the net energy for
tunneling of the neutral deflated state hydrogen to the adjacent
nucleus. Heavy lattice nuclei magnetic moments are periodically
enhanced by electrons which enter the nucleus in their ordinary
orbital states. That orbital electrons enter nuclei is evidenced by
the facts that (1) they are point particles in valid QM treatments,
with non-zero nucleus residence probabilites, and (2) evidenced by
the existence of electron capture. The magnetic moment of an
electron is 3 orders of magnitude larger than typical nuclei. Some
nuclei have no magnetic moment at all. Orbital electrons, when in a
heavy nucleus, have the ability to form momentary small deflated
state nuclear components, and thus provide extremely large nuclear
magnetic moments to the heavy nuclei. When in the nucleus, the
electrons can momentarily magnetically bind to nuclear particles,
such as protons or quarks, including strange quarks, sometimes
resulting in weak reactions between an electron and strange quark,
and thereby leaving behind unpaired strange matter. Strange quark
pairs are produced from the vacuum in nuclei. If one strange quark
is weakly transmuted, or catalytically extracted, then the paired
strange quark remains behind in a potentially long term stable form.
By my theory, nuclear electrons have the ability to catalyze strange
particle production from the vacuum and separate them, as well as
produce low energy state and thus stable product particles. See:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CFnuclearReactions.pdf
This strange matter catalysis process, which is primarily magnetic
force based, has the potential to produce and store antimatter, and
to dwarf the capacity and energy density of all other methods of
energy storage and production. The momentary extremely low energy
state of deflated nuclei in a heavy nucleus reaction has the
potential to produce stable and separated matter and antimatter
strange particles, hyperons, and hyper nuclei. That is perhaps the
most significant part of deflation fusion theory.
The formation of the deflated state in bare hydrogen nuclei, e.g.
lattice absorbed nuclei, is feasible in an electron flux provided
the flux density is high enough. I theorized this some years ago.
What is new, and related to Brian Ahern's work, is the significance
of magnetic vortices, i.e. electron vortices. These vortices produce
a dense electron flux in the vicinity of absorbed hydrogen nuclei,
and thus can be expected to greatly enhance the probability of the
deflated state hydrogen nuclei in their presence.
Non-magnetic material can be made magnetic within nanopores, by
creation of rings of free electrons at the nanopore metal boundary.
Nickel itself can be magnetic or not, depending on the chemical
loading processes and chemical nature of the nanopores in which it is
embedded, and depending on the presence sometimes of a single iron atom.
These are some of the facts and theories behind my post regarding E-
cats etc. last April:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg44662.html
Magnetism, especially magnetic *gradient* induced tunneling of
neutral particles with high magnetic moments, is key to LENR. It is
notable that this has been a key difference between my theory and
Windom Larsen theory. If an electron has a weak reaction with a
proton, creating a slow neutron, prior to its fusion with a heavy
nucleus, then the 3 orders of magnitude larger electron magnetic
moment is lost. The massive magnetic gradients permitting tunneling
into lattice element nuclei is lost. The reactions themselves, and
their products, can be expected to have massive and in some cases
long lasting signatures. No energy deficit is brought to the
composite nucleus, as it is with deflation fusion. No prospect
exists for follow-on weak reactions because the electron no longer
exists.
Magnetism is the key. Magnetic orbitals at nuclear radii or less are
key. This theme runs throughout deflation fusion theory.
I was going to create a deflation fusion FAQ some months ago, and do
a couple key experiments, but was ironically distracted by a circus
act, with snakes and clowns.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
