Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> And Prof. Piantelli is not involved in any way. >> > > Prof. Stremmenos too stresses (again) that he is absolutely not involved > in this, and hasn't been for quite some time: > > http://www.nyteknik.se/**incoming/article3358406.ece/** > BINARY/Letter+from+Stremmenos+**Nov2011+%28pdf%29 I do not know what to make of this. One thing is clear: assuming Defkalion has the technology, if they wanted to bring this controversy to an end, they could do so in a few days by allowing proper tests. Evidently, for some reason, they do not wish to bring the controversy to a close. Perhaps they have other priorities. Either that or the accusations made by Rossi and Stremmenos are true, and Defkalion *cannot* demonstrate their product. The fact that they allow this circus to continue is suspicious. I find it difficult to believe that a legitimate company does not respond to this public relations fiasco. It is appalling. If I ran a company and a member of the Board of Directors was saying things like Stremmenos is, I would take immediate steps to set the record straight. I mean with a test. Not a lawsuit or anything like that. That would be counterproductive. - Jed
