That is an interesting concept Horace. I suspect that black holes could cause a serious kink in the operation of the LHC. A while back I was considering another phenomenon that might be important in this case. At the time I was thinking about time dilation and its effects upon matter and had an interesting thought experiment. According to special relativity, as an object moves faster its time defined processes begin to slow down relative to us the observers. I pictured what might happen to a pair of protons near each other and obtained some interesting results. Normally, they would repel each other due to the same charge and begin to accelerate apart. This is of course what we would measure if they were stationary. Next, I assumed that I was standing at a stationary observation point and watching a pair move past me rapidly. I calculated that the magnetic force acting upon one by the other would be in direct opposition to the electric repulsion and the net force thus reduced in magnitude. This reduction of force continued to increase as the pair velocity increased until it became zero at the speed of light. This result made a great deal of sense since at that speed time would cease to pass for the pair of protons from my point of view and they would not accelerate apart. With this model in mind, it seems possible that a small outside push from our world would be able to push the two protons together resulting in fusion. Maybe this is what is occurring in this situation. A kink in the magnetic field such as a small gradient might result in the fusion of protons leading to the disruption of the beam. This effect would become more and more apparent as the speed of the protons increases which may be the reason that it has not been observed until now. Dave
-----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Dec 3, 2011 2:02 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:LHC plagued by UFOs n Dec 2, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Seriously, http://www.livescience.com/17207-ufos-disrupting-search-god- particle.html [snip] > Even more UFO events, and resulting beam dumps, happened at a point in the beam just past objects called injector kicker magnets (MKIs), suggesting that these magnets are a major source of the mystery objects. The large impact of these UFOs implied that they were being accelerated toward the proton beam by the magnets, which could only happen if the UFO particles were charged. [snip] An unexpected greater mystery? Serendipidous Science! T I have a wild idea. It could be black holes. One of the most rofound predictions of gravimagnetic theory is that virtual photons arry no gravitational charge. They have zero gravitational mass. herefore, black holes will accumulate magnetic fields corresponding o the sum of the magnetic moments they consume. This could be useful or using black holes as power supplies, in that they can be ontained by an actively controlled magnetic containment field. It would be natural for black holes to accumulate in the vicinity of agnets. The biggest hole in this explanation of the UFOs is the istance of the of the MKI's and beam origin from the target area. f they are accumulating at such large distances, then the number of lack holes being generated would have to be huge. Further, their vaporation rate would have to be slow to non-existent for such an ccumulation to take place. One of the most intimidating deductions from my gravimagnetic theory as the prediction, mandated by symmetry, that black holes ontinually increase in mass by separating mass charge pairs from acuum fluctuations. This process conflicts with the Hawking adiation theory, because the Hawking radiation theory does not take nto account the existence of negative gravitational mass charge. urther, there is no Swartzchild radius for negative gravitational harge matter. A matter pair of with opposed gravitational charge can e separated anywhere within the black hole, with the negative ravitational charge half being accelerated out of the black hole at normous energies. The interior of a black holes is likely a very nergetic place, having a large particle and photon flux, even if no atter is accreting. This is due to mass manufacturing from the acuum. Charged pairs which are fully separated in the mix, and thus ave gravitational charge, are likely to recombine before the egative mass particle can escape. However, due to their real mass hey will generate real photons upon annihilation. If either or both f the annihilation photons has a negative mass charge, then it will ave a high probability of being quickly expelled from the black hole ue to low probability to react with other identical escaping hotons. If the photon interacts with charged particles on the way hen it can split off into 3 photons, two of which have negative ravitational mass, or create additional negative gravitational mass eal particle pairs from their extreme energies. A black hole with ven near Planck mass might not evaporate as predicted by Hawking, ut might actually continue to grow, while emitting massive amounts f negative gravitational mass matter, which I called "cosmic matter" n my paper: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CosmicSearch.pdf The nature of the matter so created depends on symmetry issues iscussed here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/GravityPairs.pdf By the gravimagnetic theory, cosmic matter is possibly, or even just argely, mirror matter. Therefore the negative gravitational mass ssuing forth from ordinary mass black holes would have a very low oupling factor with ordinary matter, and essentially be invisible. his goes for both the real matter and real photons produced from the lack hole. The black holes themselves would have a high degree of nteraction with ordinary matter in the vicinity though, via their ncredibly strong and continually growing B fields. If these things are true, then the tiny black holes that escape the ocal magnets, especially when they are powered down, will ventually head for the center of the earth. It will soon be all ver here if the shutdowns are due to itinerant black holes, and the vaporation rate does not exceed the negative mass charge generation ate for small black holes. Best regards, Horace Heffner ttp://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
