Hi Jones, Yes I did pitch this idea to Moller but his reply indicated that I needed to be a serious investor before he and Frolov could
Commit any further energy into this pursuit. He is presently engaged in other work that would preclude much near term effort on his part. I wanted to sputter the NI-H powder on the inside of the MAHG and only use Tungsten as the disassociator/heater across which the stream would pass like atomic welding - at the time of these communications - circa April 2010, I was still pushing the idea of an external hydrogen circulation to force more Casimir translations of gas atoms through the powder [H-M]. You gave me some additional insight when you convinced me the circulation was unnecessary as the random motion of heated gas was already more than enough to push the atoms and molecules to migrate rapidly through the Casimir tapestry of geometries. We are both uniquely aware of the inverse foundation between skeletal cats like Rayney nickel and nano powders both resulting in nano geometry but Then I read the Cornell report that catalytic action only occurs at openings and defects in nanotubes and it hit me! Catalytic action is simply rapid change in the value of vacuum energy density. The 2005 paper by Naudts said the hydrino was relativistic but he never said how it became so. The energy density was the answer and we already had reports of modified half lives to support it. If the paradox twin approaching an even horizon could remotely measure his greatly accelerated earthbound twin's vacuum energy density it would appear decreased from his perspective, Exactly the same way energy density appears reduced to us in Casimir theory but without displacing the longer vacuum wavelengths. The wavelengths actually dilate their ratio of space to time to fit between the suppression boundaries changing the inertial frame for any gas atoms that happen to occupy the same suppressed region -of course you don't get something for nothing so the exterior boundaries will all contribute a retardation zone where these wavelengths instead compress to an increased density but dispersed over a much larger and shallow region before the isotropy can reassert itself. Such a scenario supports the claims of anomalous cooling and radioactive half life increase being much smaller than corresponding claims of anomalous heat and half life decrease. I spent some time in an environmental lab testing capacitor banks for destructive resonance, the banks were subjected to change in acceleration [jerk] via shaker tables one axis at a time. I was amazed at how little energy could send these capacitors rolling out of the banks minus their legs when a destructive frequency occurred. Your suggestion regarding the circulation and Horace's dismissal of my dilation factors made me realize catalytic action couldn't be just time dilation as this was not significant enough. So combining all three concepts I came to the conclusion that the suppression sets up a certain average energy density and then the hydrogen atoms are "jerked" back and forth along the temporal axis [from our perspective] like the capacitor bank on a vibration table only instead of tearing the legs off capacitors, this natural force provides a discount on molecular disassociation levels, accelerates - slingshots atoms between different inertial frames and is responsible for catalytic action. In the case of anomalous heat and radioactive decay it is just a super form of catalytic action combined with a second natural force like the tendency of hydrogen to form h2 engineered into an endless loop. I don't deny LENR ash but think a lesser interim step like Lyne and Moller posit of h1><h2 oscillation or Haisch and Moddels Lamb pinch is required to make those less probable reactions possible. Regards Fran Jones Beene Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:08:02 -0800 Say Terry, Since you followed that forum for a number of years, and since we discussed at the time that the MAHG device could have been vastly improved had nickel, rather than tungsten, been sputtered on the anode wall (at least under the teachings of Mills' theory)... and given this was before we were generally aware of the paradigm-shifting value of "nano" anything ... ... yes, sputtering does produce a small percentage of porosity in the nano range (this is still part of the long 'setup' to the original question) ... so, what are the chances that Andrea was tuning into that forum, and what are the chances that what he did early on, basically, was to make his E-Cat in the configuration of an RF tube, like MAHG but with nano-nickel applied to the anode (as we begged Moller to do)... and that the so-called central heater element is now being identified as a cathode heater for the RF filament - and given that we now know that RF is being used ???? IOW - the E-Cat is NOT inconsistent with a MAHG tube, and we might have essentially suggested to AR all of the details that he needed to know. At the time - we wanted Moller (thru Naudin) to do this - to conform to an underlying theory which had exhibited promising but disputed results for a decade ... Whoa ... this is not out of the question, is it? I think Fran Roarty might have even suggested a version of this scenario some time ago, but the possibility did not register with me at the time, since we did NOT know about the RF input till recently, and since Naudin never did correct his errors. I am blown-away by this sudden realization ... Jones
