>Yes he is, but I have read many messages here saying he is NOT lying and I 
>thought I have prejudices against him for the following story:

Rossi is lying  and we have some facts about it.
In an interview (March) he said that he’s not asking money and that he will be 
paid ONLY when the 1MW reactor was delivered. In the same time, he asked a lot 
of money to Defkalion for his “technology”, with a deadline around June. 

QUOTES:
“I am assuming all the risks. No one is risking any money except me,” said the 
Italian engineer Andrea Rossi
“I get paid (by Defkalion) only when the installation is delivered and if it 
works. I do not want people to spend any money until I have started and tested 
my one-megawatt plant,” said Rossi.

But yeah, now comes Jed Rothwell saying that this is not lying and that every 
businessman like Edison and Jobs done that. Yeah.

From: Peter Gluck 
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:25 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

Yes he is, but I have read many messages here saying he is NOT lying and I 
thought I have prejudices against him for the following story: 

He claims to be the discoverer of an absolutely new and original Ni-H LENR 
method and denies any connection with the achievements of the past. 

Newton has used a rather clumsy metaphor “If I have seen further it is only by 
standing on the shoulders of giants” (don’t try this it is risky even for 
acrobats- but metaphors have not much to do with practice and common sense they 
are poetical and symbolistic. Andrea Rossi on the contrary, answered to my 
question on Krivit’s blog saying: “My process has nothing to do with the 
process of Piantelli, The proof is that I am making operating reactors; he is 
not.” I was shocked, did not believed this  statement and disliked strongly the 
logic and the ethics on which it is based. 

But it is probably my fault and bias.

Peter





On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]> wrote:

  >Not in LENR I want to tell.

  So Rossi is not in LENR? 



  From: Peter Gluck 
  Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:11 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

  Not in LENR I want to tell. 
  Peter


  On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Mattia Rizzi <[email protected]> wrote:

    > 
    We have the great luck that we don't know liers. 

    LOL


    From: Peter Gluck 
    Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 7:43 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [Vo]:can we use such a program?

    We have the great luck that we don't know liers. 
    Thank you for signalling the book.
    peter


    On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, ecat builder <[email protected]> wrote:

      We're not there yet.. but a 100% accurate lie detector would change 
everything.
      This book is a fun read on the subject: The Truth Machine by James 
Halperin
      http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Machine-Speculative-Novel/dp/0345410564
      - Brad

      > Software That Listens for Lies:
      >






    -- 
    Dr. Peter Gluck 
    Cluj, Romania
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





  -- 
  Dr. Peter Gluck 
  Cluj, Romania
  http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck 
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to