Correction: why was used so much water flux. From: Mattia Rizzi Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:51 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat
>An ongoing argument here is about the adequacy of the inspection done on the >device of October 6. Another good question: why was used so little water flux? Why not redurece the water flux and get 30-40 degrees Celsiusof difference instead of 4-5 degrees?
