Mary: If you have a PayPal acct, I will gladly donate $20 to the cause.
Just so the people funding the effort and the person performing the tests all agree beforehand, Can someone put together a brief document with: - tests to perform - rough diagram of the test setup - test procedures I don't think we need anything too sophisticated as far as the boiler. a tea kettle boiling on the stove would be sufficient, with a hose connecting the pour spout to the primary side of the heat exchanger. -Mark From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Yo: Peter Heckert! Is a 0.1 mm gap a problem or not? On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I'll tell you but you won't do it. Get a countercurrent heat exchanger >> and hook up the primary input to a good healthy flow of dry steam. > > > If you purchase one and ship it to me, I will try it. My address is at > LENR-CANR.org. I found some heat exchangers -- anyone know if one of these is identical or equivalent to Rossi's? If so, I will consider sending one to Jed. What may hold me back is that however the T out thermocouple placement issue resolves, it doesn't help that much with verifying that Rossi's October 6 test was legitimate. Anyway, here is the link to the heat exchangers: http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8 <http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=plate+heat+exchanger&tag=googhydr -20&index=aps&hvadid=7905675585&ref=pd_sl_5bhlqv6vgj_b> &keywords=plate+heat+exchanger&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=7905675585&r ef=pd_sl_5bhlqv6vgj_b

