Mary:

If you have a PayPal acct, I will gladly donate $20 to the cause.

 

Just so the people funding the effort and the person performing the tests
all agree beforehand,

Can someone put together a brief document with:

-        tests to perform

-        rough diagram of the test setup 

-        test procedures

 

I don't think we need anything too sophisticated as far as the boiler. a tea
kettle boiling on the stove would be sufficient, with a hose connecting the
pour spout to the primary side of the heat exchanger. 

 

-Mark

 

From: Mary Yugo [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Yo: Peter Heckert! Is a 0.1 mm gap a problem or not?

 



On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>>
>> I'll tell you but you won't do it.  Get a countercurrent heat exchanger
>> and hook up the primary input to a good healthy flow of dry steam.
>
>
> If you purchase one and ship it to me, I will try it. My address is at
> LENR-CANR.org.

I found some heat exchangers -- anyone know if one of these is identical or
equivalent to Rossi's?  If so, I will consider sending one to Jed.  What may
hold me back is that however the T out thermocouple placement issue
resolves, it doesn't help that much with verifying that Rossi's October 6
test was legitimate.   Anyway, here is the link to the heat exchangers:

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8
<http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=plate+heat+exchanger&tag=googhydr
-20&index=aps&hvadid=7905675585&ref=pd_sl_5bhlqv6vgj_b>
&keywords=plate+heat+exchanger&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=7905675585&r
ef=pd_sl_5bhlqv6vgj_b



Reply via email to